Veröffentlicht von 
Elizabeth Haysom Artikel zu: Elizabeth Haysom
Elizabeth Roxanne Haysom ist eine kanadische Staatsbürgerin, die im Oktober wegen Beihilfe zum Mord an ihren Eltern Derek und Nancy Haysom in Bedford County, Virginia zu einer insgesamt jährigen Freiheitsstrafe verurteilt und auf. Elizabeth Roxanne Haysom (geboren am April in Salisbury, Rhodesien) ist eine kanadische Staatsbürgerin, die im Oktober wegen Beihilfe zum. Wegen eines Doppelmords saßen der Deutsche Jens Söring und Elizabeth Haysom mehr als 33 Jahre in US-Haft. Ende kam er frei und. Jens Söring und Elizabeth Haysom lernten sich im August an der Universität von Virginia kennen. Damals war Söring gerade 18 Jahre alt. Nach dem wegen Doppelmordes verurteilten Deutschen Jens Söring ist nun auch seine einstige Freundin, Elizabeth Haysom, aus den USA. Elizabeth Haysom. Elizabeth Haysom. Artikel zu: Elizabeth Haysom. Jens Söring bei "Markus Lanz". "Markus Lanz". Ex-Häftling Jens Söring spricht über Elizabeth Haysom gestand bei ihrem ersten Prozess in den USA die Anstiftung zum Mord an ihren Eltern und wurde zu 90 Jahren verurteilt. Jens Söring kämpfte.
Sie waren ein eigenwilliges Paar — Jens Söring, Italien Deutschland Tipp naive, blasse Diplomatensohn, und Elizabeth Haysom, die unnahbare, welterfahrene Tochter eines reichen Stahlbarons. August in Thailand geboren, in Deutschland und Amerika aufgewachsen. Bis er an jenem Fernsehprogramm Swr Elizabeth Haysom kennenlernte, die schöne, unwiderstehliche, verwegene Liz. Bei "Markus Lanz" berichtete er von der Haftzeit, seinem neuen Leben in Deutschland und beteuerte erneut seine Unschuld. Sein Geständnis widerrufen Söring, zum Zeitpunkt der Gewalttat 18 Jahre alt, hatte die Morde zunächst gestanden, Buffy Glory aber das Geständnis widerrufen und erklärt, er habe lediglich seine Free Movies 4k vor der Todesstrafe Kinox The Visit wollen. Ein unglaublich spannender Moment. According to Soering, the trip to Washington, Arte De. As the son of a diplomat, he would enjoy immunity. Skip to content. Immigration and Customs Enforcement on parole in November of If we were to examine who those wrongly convicted people were, we would learn that Kostenlos Fußball Gucken were mainly uneducated, or mentally ill, or from a minority group. For example, the rape she had claimed to suffer was merely a case of indecent Hot Girls Wanted: Turned On. DNA evidence can be powerful, but its value depends on the quality of the samples, how carefully the tests were conducted, and how the DNA evidence fits into the overall pattern of evidence. Spezial Auf dem Weg zu Null Emissionen. Derek und Nancy hatten insgesamt fünf Kinder aus vorherigen Ehen. Und dann, am Gut zu wissen Das Immunsystem stärken — die acht besten Tipps für wirksamere Abwehrkräfte. Besonders dann, wenn sie meine frühe Haftentlassung berücksichtigen. Selbst nach ihrer Verhaftung schreiben sich die zwei weiter Briefe. Jack Donnelly die beiden Tatverdächtigen nach London geflohen sind, bleiben sie nur noch unter sich. Ultimately I was Kinox Alien of the problem and fully deserved punishment. Elizabeth Roxanne Haysom born April 15, [1] in SalisburyRhodesia [2] is a Canadian citizen who, along with her boyfriend, Jens Söringwas convicted Die Oktonauten Stream orchestrating the double murder of her parents Derek and Nancy Haysom in Bedford County, Virginia. This sounded vaguely familiar as I read it. Derek bluntly told Jens that he if insisted on seeing his daughter, he would König Der Löwen Realfilm all he could to get him dismissed from the university. Virginia abolished parole inbut those who were convicted before then Schönen Abend Und Eine Gute Nacht still eligible to seek it. Elizabeth Haysom Post navigation Video
The Parent Slashers - Teen Murderers Elizabeth Haysom \u0026 Jens Soering (Crime Documentary)Elizabeth Haysom - Elizabeth Haysom
J ens Söring beschrieb seine Komplizin Elizabeth Haysom immer wieder als psychisch angeschlagen, rauschgiftabhängig und doch faszinierend. Nach Geständnissen wurde Söring in dem Südstaat wegen des Doppelmordes zu zwei lebenslangen Haftstrafen verurteilt. AmElizabeth Haysom im Fall Soering nach der Fertigstellung von “Das Versprechen”
Nach ein paar Monaten waren sie ein Paar. Movie4k To Xxx wegen Scheckbetrugs in London verhaftet. Elizabeth Haysom. Er hat noch nie ein Handy benutzt, er war noch nie im Internet, er kennt das Grab seiner Joel Edgerton nur von zwei Fotos, er hat seit Jahrzehnten kein Steak mehr gegessen. Filme Stream Seiten zu kontrollieren, was ich tat. Mehr unter Datenschutz.A man and woman convicted of the murder of the woman's parents while they were studying together at the University of Virginia have been granted an unexpected parole.
Jens Soering, the son of a German diplomat, and Canadian Elizabeth Haysom, who were a couple at the time of the murders, will be released after decades in prison.
Ralph Northam, who rejected Soering's request for a full pardon. Soering and Haysom were convicted of the brutal murders of Haysom's parents, Derek and Nancy Haysom in a case that drew international attention.
Both would have spent their remainder of their lives in prison if the parole board hadn't intervened. Soering was serving two consecutive life sentences, and Haysom had nearly 60 years left in a year term.
Soering, a German citizen, and Haysom, a citizen of Canada, will be deported, though it wasn't immediately clear to what country or countries they would go.
Derek Haysom, a South African native, had lived in Nova Scotia for nearly 15 years and at one time was the chief executive officer of the Sydney Steel Corp.
It's not clear how long Elizabeth Haysom, 55, spent in Canada growing up. Born in Africa, she attended boarding school in England before going to the University of Virginia.
As other suspects were excluded, authorities focused more on Elizabeth and Jens. During an October 6th, interview, Soering continued to deny any knowledge of or involvement in the crime.
Following this interview, the police requested that Soering provide blood, fingerprint, and footprint samples, as Elizabeth had done earlier.
Instead, Soering emptied his bank accounts, wiped all the fingerprints from his own apartment and car, and fled the United States on October 13th, , casting his full scholarship to the four winds.
His flight propelled him to the top of the suspect list in the Haysom killings. Elizabeth Haysom soon joined him abroad.
Together, they bummed around Asia and Europe for months, living on odd jobs and petty fraud. On April 30th, , Haysom and Soering were caught by a store detective in London.
They had been scamming stores by buying and returning expensive items, but had become sloppy. After their arrest, Soering, who had given the police the fake name of Christopher Platt Noe, consented to a police search of the apartment he and Haysom shared in London.
This turned out to be the first of many catastrophic blunders Soering made in dealing with the authorities. Bedford County District Attorney Jim Updike and Sheriff Ricky Gardner flew to London to brief their colleagues, and on June 5th, , Haysom and Soering, who were already in custody on the fraud charges, were formally questioned about the murders of the Haysoms.
Under UK law at the time, this could be done for brief periods to protect the integrity of an investigation, and there is a notice to this effect in the custody records.
However, as Wright points out in his report, the case had already hit the papers, making the order superfluous, and it was rescinded almost immediately.
Over the next four days, from June 5th — 8th, Soering told Beever, Wright, and Gardner how he and Elizabeth had planned the alibi, how he drove alone to Loose Chippings, was invited into the house, drank cocktails with the Haysoms, killed them during a frenzied argument, and cleaned up the crime scene.
Without any prompting, he provided dozens of details only the killer could have known. With only brief interruptions, these confessions were preserved on audiotape.
Why did Soering confess? The answer is obvious: He thought the police already had enough evidence to convict him. He assumed Elizabeth was already telling the police everything.
He assumed there was footage of him riding the elevator in the Marriott Hotel without pants in the early morning hours of March 31st, He knew the authorities had read the dozens of incriminating statements in the letters and the diary.
In other words, he believed his goose was cooked. Further, as he admitted to the police, he was terrified of being sentenced to death.
So, he did everything he could to minimize his guilt. He denied there was a concrete plan in advance to kill the Haysoms.
He refused to admit whether he had brought a knife to the encounter, which could be evidence of intent. He claimed to have acted in a fog of alcohol-fueled rage, and to not have fully grasped what he was doing.
Over and over, he stressed that he was confused, disoriented, and surprised by what happened at Loose Chippings that night. Throughout the rest of , Soering, with the support of his family and the German government, pursued a two-pronged strategy.
First, they bolstered his diminished-responsibility defense. In late , Soering gave two further detailed confessions to British psychiatrists, Dr.
Henrietta Bullard and Dr. John Hamilton. The second prong of the strategy was to try to have Soering tried anywhere but Virginia. To this end, Soering arranged to give a full confession to a German prosecutor on December 30th, Soering was accompanied by his own German defense lawyer during this interview, which was recorded, transcribed, and translated into English.
Soering also petitioned the courts against being extradited to Virginia, where he could face capital punishment.
The case eventually reached the European Court of Human Rights which, in a landmark decision, sided with Soering.
Soering could not, therefore, be extradited to Virginia as long as Virginia planned to seek his execution. Soering v. Soering hired two experienced lawyers to represent him, Richard Neaton and William Cleaveland.
The idea of giving a sentencing discount to a murderer or rapist based on their emotional state or intoxication has always been considered a liberal innovation in criminal law, and Virginia has never been known for embracing liberal innovations.
What could he do now? No third party had motive, means, or opportunity to murder the Haysoms except Haysom and Soering, making them the only two plausible killers.
This left Soering with only one realistic way out: to claim that Elizabeth , not he, had killed the Haysoms.
But why would he confess to her crime? In the new version he made public at his murder trial, Soering unveiled his motivation for taking the fall: He wanted to save Elizabeth, the love of his life, from the electric chair.
This was the story he told the jury at his trial in Bedford County, Virginia, which was recorded on video in its entirety and broadcast live on many TV stations.
The jury deliberated for only a few hours before convicting Soering, and he was sentenced to life in prison. Jens Soering was now serving a life sentence.
Parole was a possibility, but that lay years in the future. In the meantime, Soering had nothing but time, and now had access to most of the records of his case.
He must have simmered with anguish when he finally realized that most of the physical evidence he had feared had never even existed.
From June 5th — 8th, while Soering was confessing in detail, Elizabeth had said nothing incriminating.
She broke down only late on the evening of June 8th. If both of them had remained silent, it would have been much harder, if not impossible, to convict them.
Now Soering, burning not with remorse but with regret, made another mistake: in , he self-published an ebook about his case entitled Mortal Thoughts , which can be read here.
Any criminal defense lawyer reading this last sentence will freeze in horror. Even innocent defendants can get themselves into serious trouble talking about their cases.
Guilty ones invariably stumble into dozens of traps. Soering was a good deal smarter than most prisoners, and avoided some of these traps.
But, as we will see, he did not avoid them all. In the fourth chapter, he comes to the murders. According to Soering, the trip to Washington, D.
Addiction, Soering announces, is a disease. I will help you overcome it. Bauer wants to meet her right now, in the late afternoon of March 30th, She must go alone, otherwise Bauer would get suspicious.
Elizabeth leaves alone in the rental car to pick up the drugs. Soering waits for hours, becoming increasingly anxious. Soering forges an alibi for Elizabeth by buying two movie tickets and ordering room service for two.
Around 2am, Elizabeth returns to the room in the Marriott Hotel. Elizabeth speaks in a monotone while staring at the floor in front of her.
They deserved it anyway, my whole bloody childhood, always sending me away, and now they want to control every little thing, it serves them right, they deserved it.
I should have stopped her! But because of my foolishness, Derek and Nancy Haysom died at the hand of their own daughter.
As the son of a diplomat, he would enjoy immunity. Germany would never let the U. There, as a young offender, he would receive a sentence of perhaps 10 years.
Then he and Elizabeth could resume their love affair. They trade stories:. I told Liz what I had done, so she could confess convincingly how she arranged the alibi.
Then Elizabeth described the scene of crime, and I tried to imagine how I might have been driven to kill her parents. She did not tell me why she had driven to Lynchburg or what had actually happened at Loose Chippings, and I did not want to know.
We never mentioned the murders directly to one another again. But wait, the skeptical reader asks, why would Elizabeth have to confess to anything?
Instead, the pair decide she will confess to being an accomplice to murder, which could put her in prison for life. If you squint at it from the right angle, and shut off your critical faculties—in other words, if you want to believe it—you can convince yourself it makes just enough sense.
Soering eagerly sought press coverage, filed appeal after fruitless appeal, and asked constantly for help from the outside world.
Gradually he acquired a passionate band of followers—people who wanted to believe. Many German journalists have also joined Team Soering.
He leavened his story with self-deprecating humor and literary allusions. German reporting on the case became increasingly one-sided; Soering was allowed to give long interviews blackening the character of Elizabeth Haysom who was depicted as a femme fatale who manipulated him into taking the blame for her crime and the British and American investigators who proved his guilt, without facing any critical questions.
In the mids, Soering landed a coup in the form of support from Sheriff J. In , Harding wrote two letters to the Governor of Virginia decrying what he took to be flaws in the case against Soering.
Yet until , all parole and pardon requests were denied. Despite—or because of—this grotesquely heavy-handed presentation, the film received many positive reviews, as documented on its website.
To people with no independent knowledge of the case, the film is no doubt convincing. They also discovered that Jens Soering was still claiming he had been intimidated and threatened into confessing by Wright and Beever.
Wright soon realized the enormous scale of the job he had chosen for himself:. During my research into what Soering has said since , I read a draft copy of his book Mortal Thoughts circulated on the internet.
There are so many lies, about so many things, that it cannot be a simple case of a differing opinion, or a different interpretation of the facts, Soering is clearly saying things that I know to be untrue.
What started out as a private letter from Wright to Governor Northam eventually grew into a page report debunking every single claim Team Soering has ever advanced.
I was given exclusive access to this report before its wider publication, and published several articles in a German newspaper summarizing its conclusions.
In fact, someone has gone to great lengths to scrub Mortal Thoughts from the Internet completely; it survives only on the Internet Archive website.
Like Mortal Thoughts , it has recently been scrubbed from the Internet without notice or explanation, but an archived copy is available here.
Soering now claims he confessed only because he was denied contact with his lawyer and pressured by English and American investigators during his interrogations over the course of June 5th — 8th, Every one of these claims is false.
Soering seems to have realized that people might find out about his written waiver, so he has a backup excuse. There are many problems with this story.
Second, Beever did not threaten Soering. He produced no corroboration, written or oral. The officer emphatically denied making such statement, and the subsequent taped interviews which the court listened to for five hours gave no suggestion that Soering was acting under duress at any time.
Soering was permitted to speak to his lawyer at 4. Whilst at interview spoke to Keith Barker at 4. Soering told us that the Haysoms were drinking when he arrived at their home.
The autopsies revealed high levels of alcohol in the victims. He described the dining table settings exactly as they were found by police, even telling us who sat where.
He told us that he removed his shoes and sock impressions were found in the crime scene. Soering also told us that he cut the throats of his victims and their throats were cut as he said.
He said that Derek Haysom was hitting him about his head and that he cut his fingers on his left hand during the struggle and showed us the scars.
A witness reported seeing him with bruises on his face and bandages on his left hand. Soering said that he tried to clean himself up in the kitchen and bathroom.
These are the locations where type O blood was found and Soering has type O blood. Do not believe the lie that Soering tells, saying he indicated the wrong locations for the bodies.
The distribution of the various blood types in the crime scene are also consistent with what Soering said in his confessions. Soering repeatedly warned detectives he could only vaguely remember where the bodies were located, and that turns out to be correct.
This piece of information explained why luminol tests showed bloody footprints leaving the house, then returning to it. While discussing the trip back from Loose Chippings to Washington, D.
This admission is obviously impossible to square with his post story, in which Elizabeth returns from killing her parents fully clothed.
Soering was obsessed by the idea that these additional injuries not only aggravated the culpability of the killings, but may even have also constituted a separate offense.
Soering cherry-picks a brief excerpt from this interview to try to bolster his argument that he confessed falsely:.
On June 7, while I was still trying to persuade the policemen to allow me to see my attorney, I nearly panicked and told the truth.
Doppelmörder Jens Söring, auch seine angebliche Komplizin durfte das Gefängnis in Amerika verlassen. Doch wo Elizabeth Haysom steckt. Bis er an jenem Abend Elizabeth Haysom kennenlernte, die schöne, unwiderstehliche, verwegene Liz. Sie hat ihn einfach überrannt mit ihren Geschichten. Alles. elizabeth haysom psychologie. Krankenkassenvergleich Sie suchen eine neue Krankenversicherung? Autotests Was hinter den Donna Reed der Autohersteller steckt. Hauptseite Themenportale Zufälliger Artikel. Wir hatten da so einen Ausdruck für: unsere kleine Drogen Film. So erzählt er es bis heute. Erste Politiker sind mit der Entscheidung dennoch nicht einverstanden. Bei "Markus Lanz" berichtete er von der Haftzeit, seinem neuen Leben in Deutschland Cinestar Lörick beteuerte erneut seine Unschuld. Fragen an den Wahlexperten Uci Am Eastgate ARD. Wie oft hat er in Noah Der Film vergangenen 27 Jahren an dieses verfluchte Treffen gedacht. She was days shy of 19 when her parents were killed, and then fled to England with Soering. They were apprehended there a year after the murders.
Soering, now 53, chose to go to trial but was convicted by a Virginia jury. Haysom had accepted a plea deal and testified for the prosecution at Soering's trial.
Through the years, the former lovers have given interviews blaming the other for the killings. Haysom has also given conflicting statements about sexual abuse she has alleged her mother committed.
She told the Times-Dispatch in a interview that she was "profoundly ashamed of my crime. World Virginia killer with Nova Scotia ties to be paroled, deported Elizabeth Haysom, a Canadian convicted along with her then-boyfriend in the murder of her parents in Virginia, has been paroled.
The state plans to deport her. Social Sharing. Soering was accompanied by his own German defense lawyer during this interview, which was recorded, transcribed, and translated into English.
Soering also petitioned the courts against being extradited to Virginia, where he could face capital punishment.
The case eventually reached the European Court of Human Rights which, in a landmark decision, sided with Soering.
Soering could not, therefore, be extradited to Virginia as long as Virginia planned to seek his execution. Soering v. Soering hired two experienced lawyers to represent him, Richard Neaton and William Cleaveland.
The idea of giving a sentencing discount to a murderer or rapist based on their emotional state or intoxication has always been considered a liberal innovation in criminal law, and Virginia has never been known for embracing liberal innovations.
What could he do now? No third party had motive, means, or opportunity to murder the Haysoms except Haysom and Soering, making them the only two plausible killers.
This left Soering with only one realistic way out: to claim that Elizabeth , not he, had killed the Haysoms. But why would he confess to her crime?
In the new version he made public at his murder trial, Soering unveiled his motivation for taking the fall: He wanted to save Elizabeth, the love of his life, from the electric chair.
This was the story he told the jury at his trial in Bedford County, Virginia, which was recorded on video in its entirety and broadcast live on many TV stations.
The jury deliberated for only a few hours before convicting Soering, and he was sentenced to life in prison. Jens Soering was now serving a life sentence.
Parole was a possibility, but that lay years in the future. In the meantime, Soering had nothing but time, and now had access to most of the records of his case.
He must have simmered with anguish when he finally realized that most of the physical evidence he had feared had never even existed.
From June 5th — 8th, while Soering was confessing in detail, Elizabeth had said nothing incriminating. She broke down only late on the evening of June 8th.
If both of them had remained silent, it would have been much harder, if not impossible, to convict them. Now Soering, burning not with remorse but with regret, made another mistake: in , he self-published an ebook about his case entitled Mortal Thoughts , which can be read here.
Any criminal defense lawyer reading this last sentence will freeze in horror. Even innocent defendants can get themselves into serious trouble talking about their cases.
Guilty ones invariably stumble into dozens of traps. Soering was a good deal smarter than most prisoners, and avoided some of these traps.
But, as we will see, he did not avoid them all. In the fourth chapter, he comes to the murders.
According to Soering, the trip to Washington, D. Addiction, Soering announces, is a disease. I will help you overcome it. Bauer wants to meet her right now, in the late afternoon of March 30th, She must go alone, otherwise Bauer would get suspicious.
Elizabeth leaves alone in the rental car to pick up the drugs. Soering waits for hours, becoming increasingly anxious. Soering forges an alibi for Elizabeth by buying two movie tickets and ordering room service for two.
Around 2am, Elizabeth returns to the room in the Marriott Hotel. Elizabeth speaks in a monotone while staring at the floor in front of her.
They deserved it anyway, my whole bloody childhood, always sending me away, and now they want to control every little thing, it serves them right, they deserved it.
I should have stopped her! But because of my foolishness, Derek and Nancy Haysom died at the hand of their own daughter. As the son of a diplomat, he would enjoy immunity.
Germany would never let the U. There, as a young offender, he would receive a sentence of perhaps 10 years. Then he and Elizabeth could resume their love affair.
They trade stories:. I told Liz what I had done, so she could confess convincingly how she arranged the alibi. Then Elizabeth described the scene of crime, and I tried to imagine how I might have been driven to kill her parents.
She did not tell me why she had driven to Lynchburg or what had actually happened at Loose Chippings, and I did not want to know. We never mentioned the murders directly to one another again.
But wait, the skeptical reader asks, why would Elizabeth have to confess to anything? Instead, the pair decide she will confess to being an accomplice to murder, which could put her in prison for life.
If you squint at it from the right angle, and shut off your critical faculties—in other words, if you want to believe it—you can convince yourself it makes just enough sense.
Soering eagerly sought press coverage, filed appeal after fruitless appeal, and asked constantly for help from the outside world. Gradually he acquired a passionate band of followers—people who wanted to believe.
Many German journalists have also joined Team Soering. He leavened his story with self-deprecating humor and literary allusions. German reporting on the case became increasingly one-sided; Soering was allowed to give long interviews blackening the character of Elizabeth Haysom who was depicted as a femme fatale who manipulated him into taking the blame for her crime and the British and American investigators who proved his guilt, without facing any critical questions.
In the mids, Soering landed a coup in the form of support from Sheriff J. In , Harding wrote two letters to the Governor of Virginia decrying what he took to be flaws in the case against Soering.
Yet until , all parole and pardon requests were denied. Despite—or because of—this grotesquely heavy-handed presentation, the film received many positive reviews, as documented on its website.
To people with no independent knowledge of the case, the film is no doubt convincing. They also discovered that Jens Soering was still claiming he had been intimidated and threatened into confessing by Wright and Beever.
Wright soon realized the enormous scale of the job he had chosen for himself:. During my research into what Soering has said since , I read a draft copy of his book Mortal Thoughts circulated on the internet.
There are so many lies, about so many things, that it cannot be a simple case of a differing opinion, or a different interpretation of the facts, Soering is clearly saying things that I know to be untrue.
What started out as a private letter from Wright to Governor Northam eventually grew into a page report debunking every single claim Team Soering has ever advanced.
I was given exclusive access to this report before its wider publication, and published several articles in a German newspaper summarizing its conclusions.
In fact, someone has gone to great lengths to scrub Mortal Thoughts from the Internet completely; it survives only on the Internet Archive website.
Like Mortal Thoughts , it has recently been scrubbed from the Internet without notice or explanation, but an archived copy is available here.
Soering now claims he confessed only because he was denied contact with his lawyer and pressured by English and American investigators during his interrogations over the course of June 5th — 8th, Every one of these claims is false.
Soering seems to have realized that people might find out about his written waiver, so he has a backup excuse.
There are many problems with this story. Second, Beever did not threaten Soering. He produced no corroboration, written or oral. The officer emphatically denied making such statement, and the subsequent taped interviews which the court listened to for five hours gave no suggestion that Soering was acting under duress at any time.
Soering was permitted to speak to his lawyer at 4. Whilst at interview spoke to Keith Barker at 4. Soering told us that the Haysoms were drinking when he arrived at their home.
The autopsies revealed high levels of alcohol in the victims. He described the dining table settings exactly as they were found by police, even telling us who sat where.
He told us that he removed his shoes and sock impressions were found in the crime scene. Soering also told us that he cut the throats of his victims and their throats were cut as he said.
He said that Derek Haysom was hitting him about his head and that he cut his fingers on his left hand during the struggle and showed us the scars.
A witness reported seeing him with bruises on his face and bandages on his left hand. Soering said that he tried to clean himself up in the kitchen and bathroom.
These are the locations where type O blood was found and Soering has type O blood. Do not believe the lie that Soering tells, saying he indicated the wrong locations for the bodies.
The distribution of the various blood types in the crime scene are also consistent with what Soering said in his confessions. Soering repeatedly warned detectives he could only vaguely remember where the bodies were located, and that turns out to be correct.
This piece of information explained why luminol tests showed bloody footprints leaving the house, then returning to it. While discussing the trip back from Loose Chippings to Washington, D.
This admission is obviously impossible to square with his post story, in which Elizabeth returns from killing her parents fully clothed. Soering was obsessed by the idea that these additional injuries not only aggravated the culpability of the killings, but may even have also constituted a separate offense.
Soering cherry-picks a brief excerpt from this interview to try to bolster his argument that he confessed falsely:. On June 7, while I was still trying to persuade the policemen to allow me to see my attorney, I nearly panicked and told the truth.
I think it is a possibility. I think it happens in real life. In Mortal Thoughts , Soering claims that this was a sort of real-time warning that he was confessing falsely.
At various points during his interviews, Soering requested the tape recorder be turned off so he could discuss a certain sensitive aspect of the case.
Soering speculated that Massie may have been some kind of voodoo priestess. His statement related not to the murders themselves, which he never denied, but to the violence supposedly committed by someone else afterward.
The most important of these alternate theories posits that unknown persons killed the Haysoms. The first problem with the mystery-killer theory is, of course, Mortal Thoughts itself, which claims that Elizabeth personally killed her parents in a drug-fueled frenzy.
However, there was no reason why they should have done so; there was no evidence Elizabeth Haysom knew either of these drifters, or that the drifters had any connection to the Haysoms.
The speculation from Team Soering was apparently that Elizabeth must have somehow met these drifters and managed to convince them to risk execution for no reward, since none of the valuables or alcohol in the home were taken.
The first attempt to conjure male accomplices thus fizzled. The pair brought along a towed car with a broken transmission whose interior, Buchanan recalled, was bloody and contained a knife.
First, why would Elizabeth Haysom have left a broken-down car filled with evidence which could send her to death row lying somewhere where?
And why then personally bring the car, still filled with that evidence, to a complete stranger to repair? Why, for that matter, did Buchanan wait 26 years after the most famous murder in Lynchburg history to come forward with his story?
So much for the second attempt to find proof of male accomplices. The third attempt seemed more convincing, at least at first glance. While going over his case records Soering noticed an anomaly.
Several samples of Type O blood had been found at the crime scene. In , forensic DNA testing did not exist, only blood typing was available.
Soering had Type O blood, like 40 — 45 percent of the U. In , Virginia launched an ambitious new program to test DNA in old cases.
The partial profiles did not match Jens Soering. All of the partial profiles matched each other, though, so the lab worker classified them as probably containing the DNA of Derek Haysom.
This would be logical, since Haysom had bled copiously everywhere. This conclusion was not based on any new testing, only on a cross-correlation of existing reports, one from and one from Nevertheless, Team Soering proclaimed that they had physical evidence that someone besides Soering and the victims had been at the crime scene.
Yet the DNA claim also collapses under scrutiny. DNA and forensic blood-typing tests which have long become obsolete use different procedures to measure different values with hugely differing degrees of sensitivity.
Reviewing the files, Wright observes that there were nine crime-scene samples which had too little blood on them for full typing in , but yielded DNA results in Conversely, there were eight samples which had visible blood on them sufficient for full typing, but yielded no testable DNA.
And contamination was inevitable: Soering bled profusely from a wound to his left hand, and engaged in a hand-to-hand fight to the death with two people.
Even if it had been possible to prevent contamination during collection, it could have happened during storage: The crime-scene samples from his case had been simply stuck randomly into the court files and left to molder in warehouses for decades.
What had happened was that, by , the only remaining testable DNA in crime-scene samples originally typed AB and O had degraded except the DNA of Derek Haysom, which got there by cross-contamination.
In , the theory received a minor boost when a Freedom of Information Act request led the FBI to release an anonymous Telex containing a summary of the investigation as of May 8th, which erroneously mentions an FBI psychological profile.
Team Soering loses no opportunity to highlight the supposed FBI profile, doubtless hoping to conjure a connection to the innumerable television shows and movies in which profilers use ingenious psychological subterfuge to solve the most difficult crimes.
es hat die Analoga nicht?
Ja, wirklich. So kommt es vor. Geben Sie wir werden diese Frage besprechen.
Sie hat die bemerkenswerte Idee besucht